Smart Pacemaker harmlessly dissolves in the body after it is no longer needed

Advertisement

Transient Pacemaker

Transient pacemaker

The transient pacemaker is shown before resolution. The device is flexible, stretchable and cordless. Photo credit: Northwestern University

Last summer,[{” attribute=””>Northwestern University scientists introduced the first-ever transient pacemaker — a fully implantable, wireless device that harmlessly dissolves in the body after it’s no longer needed. Now, they unveil a new, smart version that is integrated into a coordinated network of wireless, soft, flexible, wearable sensors and control units placed around the upper body.

The study was published on May 27, 2022, in the journal Science. The work was led by John A. Rogers, Igor R. Efimov, and Rishi Arora from Northwestern University.

Dissolving Pacemaker

Watch the pacemaker harmlessly degrade over time. Credit: Northwestern University

The sensors communicate with each other to continuously monitor the body’s various physiological functions, including body temperature, oxygen levels, respiration, physical activity, muscle tone, and the heart’s electrical activity.

The system then automatically analyzes this combined activity using algorithms in order to autonomously detect abnormal cardiac rhythms and decide when to pace the heart and at what rate. All this information is streamed to a smartphone or tablet, so physicians can remotely monitor their patients.

“This approach could change the way patients receive care providing multimodal, closed-loop control over essential physiological processes — through a wireless network of sensors and stimulators that operates in a manner inspired by the complex, biological feedback loops that control behaviors in living organisms.”

John A. Rogers, Louis Simpson and Kimberly Querrey Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Neurological Surgery

The new transient pacemaker and sensor/control network can be used in patients who required temporary pacing after cardiac surgery or are waiting for a permanent pacemaker. The pacemaker wirelessly harvests energy from a node within the network — a small wireless device that softly adheres to the patient’s chest. This technology eliminates the need for external hardware, including wires (or leads).

To enable the system to communicate with the patient, the researchers incorporated a small, wearable haptic-feedback device that can be worn anywhere on the body. When the sensors detect an issue (such as low battery power, incorrect device placement or pacemaker malfunction), the haptic device vibrates in specific patterns that alert wearers and inform them of the problem.

Dissolving Pacemaker MicroCT

A microCT scan of a small animal model shows how the transient pacemaker dissolves over time. Credit: Northwestern University

Insights from the experts

“This marks the first time we have paired soft, wearable electronics with transient electronic platforms,” Rogers said. “This approach could change the way patients receive care providing multimodal, closed-loop control over essential physiological processes — through a wireless network of sensors and stimulators that operates in a manner inspired by the complex, biological feedback loops that control behaviors in living organisms. 

“For temporary cardiac pacing, the system untethers patients from monitoring and stimulation apparatuses that keep them confined to a hospital setting. Instead, patients could recover in the comfort of their own homes while maintaining the peace of mind that comes with being remotely monitored by their physicians. This also would reduce the cost of health care and free up hospital beds for other patients.”

“In current settings, temporary pacemakers require a wire that is connected to an external generator that stimulates the heart,” Efimov said. “When the heart regains its ability to stimulate itself appropriately, the wire has to be pulled out. As you might imagine, this is a pretty dramatic procedure to pull out a wire connected to the heart. We decided to approach this problem from a different angle. We created a pacemaker that simply dissolves and does not need to be removed. This avoids the dangerous step of pulling out the wire.”

“We created a pacemaker that simply dissolves and does not need to be removed. This avoids the dangerous step of pulling out the wire.”

Igor R. Efimov, Professor of Biomedical Engineering

“Current pacemakers are quite intelligent and respond well to the changing needs of the patients,” Arora said. “But the wearable modules do everything traditional pacemakers do and more. A patient basically wears a little patch on their chest and gets real-time feedback to control the pacemaker. Not only is the pacemaker itself bioresorbable, it is controlled by a soft, wearable patch that allows the pacemaker to respond to the usual activities of life without needing implantable sensors.”

Rogers is the Louis Simpson and Kimberly Querrey Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Neurological Surgery at the McCormick School of Engineering and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, and the director of the Querrey Simpson Institute for Bioelectronics (QSIB). Efimov is a professor of biomedical engineering in McCormick and professor of medicine (cardiology) in Feinberg. Arora is a professor of medicine at Feinberg, and co-director of the Center for Arrhythmia Research.

Connecting the ‘body-area network’

A bioelectronics pioneer, Rogers and his lab have been developing soft, flexible, wireless wearable devices, and bioresorbable electronic technologies for nearly two decades. In the new study, Rogers and his collaborators combined and coordinated their bioresorbable, leadless pacemaker with four different skin-interfaced devices to work together. The skin-mounted devices are soft, flexible and can be gently peeled off after use, eliminating the need for surgical removal. The pacemaker naturally dissolves in the body after a period of need.

The “body-area network” includes:

  • A battery-free transient, bioresorbable pacemaker to temporarily pace the heart
  • A cardiac module that sits on the chest to provide power to and control stimulation parameters for the implanted pacemaker as well as sense electrical activity and sounds of the heart
  • A hemodynamics module that sits on the forehead to sense pulse oximetry, tissue oxygenation and vascular tone
  • A respiratory module that sits at the base of the throat to monitor coughing and respiratory activity
  • A multi-haptic-feedback module that vibrates and pulses in a variety of patterns to communicate with the patient.

“We wanted to demonstrate that it’s possible to deploy multiple different types of devices, each performing essential functions in a wirelessly coordinated manner across the body,” Rogers said. “Some are sensing. Some are delivering power. Some are stimulating. Some are providing control signals. But they all work together, trading information, making decisions based on algorithms and reacting to changing conditions. The vision of multiple bioelectronic devices all talking to one another and performing different functions at different relevant anatomical locations is a frontier area that we will continue to pursue going into the future.”

New advances, on-demand pacing

Since Northwestern’s transient pacemaker was first introduced a year ago, the researchers have made multiple improvements to advance the technology. While the previous device was flexible, the new device is flexible and stretchy, enabling it to better accommodate the changing nature of a beating heart. Another new benefit: As the transient pacemaker slowly and harmlessly dissolves, it now releases an anti-inflammatory drug to prevent foreign-body reactions.

Perhaps the most impactful advance is the device’s ability to provide pacing on-demand, based on when the patient needs it. Synced with the pacemaker, the chest-mounted cardiac module records an electrocardiogram in real time to monitor heart activity. In the study, researchers compared this wireless technology to gold-standard electrocardiograms and found it was as accurate and precise as clinical-grade systems.

“The cardiac module literally tells the pacemaker to apply stimulus to the heart,” Efimov explained. “If normal activity is regained, then it stops pacing. This is important because if you stimulate the heart when it’s unnecessary, then you risk inducing arrhythmia.”

“The pacing system is completely autonomous,” said Yeon Sik Choi, a postdoctoral fellow in Rogers’ lab and co-first author of the paper. “It can automatically detect a problem and apply treatment. It’s easy and self-contained with minimal external needs.”

Health care gentle enough for newborns 

Rogers, Efimov, Arora, and their teams believe their system would be most beneficial for the most vulnerable patients. Every year, approximately 40,000 babies are born with a hole in the wall that separates their heart’s upper chambers. About 10,000 of these cases are life threatening, requiring immediate surgery. After surgery, 100 percent of babies receive a temporary pacemaker.

“The good news is this is a temporary condition,” Efimov said. “After about five to seven days, the heart regains its ability to stimulate itself and no longer needs a pacemaker. The procedure to remove the pacemaker has improved greatly over the years, so the rate of complications is low. But we could free these babies from the wires connecting to an external generator and free them from needing a second procedure.”

Reference: “A transient, closed-loop network of wireless, body-integrated devices for autonomous electrotherapy” by Yeon Sik Choi, Hyoyoung Jeong, Rose T. Yin, Raudel Avila, Anna Pfenniger, Jaeyoung Yoo, Jong Yoon Lee, Andreas Tzavelis, Young Joong Lee, Sheena W. Chen, Helen S. Knight, Seungyeob Kim, Hak-Young Ahn, Grace Wickerson, Abraham Vázquez-Guardado, Elizabeth Higbee-Dempsey, Bender A. Russo, Michael A. Napolitano, Timothy J. Holleran, Leen Abdul Razzak, Alana N. Miniovich, Geumbee Lee, Beth Geist, Brandon Kim, Shuling Han, Jaclyn A. Brennan, Kedar Aras, Sung Soo Kwak, Joohee Kim, Emily Alexandria Waters, Xiangxing Yang, Amy Burrell, Keum San Chun, Claire Liu, Changsheng Wu, Alina Y. Rwei, Alisha N. Spann, Anthony Banks, David Johnson, Zheng Jenny Zhang, Chad R. Haney, Sung Hun Jin, Alan Varteres Sahakian, Yonggang Huang, Gregory D. Trachiotis, Bradley P. Knight, Rishi K. Arora, Igor R. Efimov and John A. Rogers, 27 May 2022, Science.
DOI: 10.1126/science.abm1703

You May Also Like